Since military disenfranchisement is standard operating procedure in liberal counties, is there any reliable estimate of how many military voters will be disenfranchised this year?How Many Military Personnel Will Be Disenfranchised In November?Need any more proof that 0-bama and the demmycraps revile the military and view them as nothing more than fourth-class citizens?How Many Military Personnel Will Be Disenfranchised In November?
Enough to secure the democratic victory.
Note that almost all of the states which are experiencing "delays" are run by democrats.
Note the most egregious violator, New York, has 320,000 citizens who will be disenfranchised.
Note that the military usually votes about 65% Republican.
Coincidence? Don't bet your life on it.How Many Military Personnel Will Be Disenfranchised In November?Thousands. And I know it doesn't take much to count them as I see in our county the Democrat commission chairman hires a few people to ride around and collect ballots from those too poor to otherwise vote and hand delivers them to his polling place where they are filled out and then counted.
Almost all of them. What I find funny is; the military now has a lot of Democrats in it, especially from the Guard and reserve. If the Guard and reserve are deployed, they will likely get screwed out of their vote too.
When I was in the Army, not too long ago, very few soldiers admitted to being Democrats. I knew three. I was in the Army for 24 years.
The Democrats did everything they could to lose the Cold War to the Soviets and help Al Qaeda now.How Many Military Personnel Will Be Disenfranchised In November?It is my understanding, as many as 300,000 possible votes will go uncounted this November. It's an atrocity. The liberals call it an oversight.How Many Military Personnel Will Be Disenfranchised In November?
As many as it takes to get the democrats in those districts elected.
It's not the first time that the democrats have tried to not count or allow military personnel to vote. It won't be the last.
To some democrats honesty in elections is just a suggestion. The end justifies the means.
Prior to the Bush v. Gore election, military ballots were routinely not counted because the number of military votes was far fewer than the difference between the candidates so counting them would have made no difference in the results.
However, that election exposed this practice and why? Because each side desperately wanted those votes and BOTH sides immediately spoke out and insisted that these votes all be counted.
I don't know how the various states operate but in MY state, Illinois, when it was learned that some counties had mailed the military ballots late all candidates insisted upon haven them all counted. Why? Again, it is a really close race and each side wants the votes; and in this state the Democratic governer is very much pro military and the Reputlican challenger is an unknown, some state rep from downstate.
Truly it is not lib versus con, it is just a matter of whether the candidates NEED to have the votes counted.How Many Military Personnel Will Be Disenfranchised In November?
Care to explain how "military disenfranchisement is standard operating procedure in liberal counties"? I seem to remember that a lot of overseas military people got screwed out of having their votes counted in Florida in 2000 by GOPster Katherine Harris.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment